MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988199372 · doi:10.1159/000133436

Mechanisms of distamycin A/DAPI chromosome staining

2008· article· en· W1988199372 on OpenAlex
G. Burckhardt, Hana Votavová, Michael F. Jantsch, C. Zimmer, J. W. LOWN, Dieter Schweizer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDAPIBiologyMetaphaseStainingDNAMolecular biologyNetropsinKaryotypeChromosomeFluorescenceDifferential stainingBiochemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular mechanism underlying distamycin A-induced differential DAPI fluorescent staining of metaphase chromosomes was studied in Sus scrofa domestica both cytologically, using, besides DAPI, two isomeric derivatives of DAPI (D288.45 and D288.48), and molecularly, by in vitro competitive-binding studies using S. scrofa satellite DNA and synthetic DNA polymers. Significant differences in heterochromatin staining were observed between D288.45 and D288.48. Distinct distamycin A/DAPI bands were obtained with DAPI and D288.45 but not with D288.48. Circular dichroism measurements were performed to characterize the displacement of DAPI from its DNA binding sites by distamycin A and also netropsin. Distamycin A was most effective in displacing DAPI when DAPI was bound to contiguous clusters of AT base pairs and much less effective in displacing DAPI bound to GC or mixed AT/GC base-pair sequences. The results of these competitive-binding studies provide the basis of a molecular explanation of the quenching phenomenon of distamycin A counterstaining on chromosomal DAPI fluorescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it