MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988204215 · doi:10.1145/2185395.2185404

Factorization properties for a MAP-modulated fluid flow model under server vacation policies (abstract only)

2012· article· en· W1988204215 on OpenAlexaff
Jung Woo Baek, Ho Woo Lee, Se Won Lee, Soohan Ahn

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactorizationComputer scienceFlow (mathematics)Extension (predicate logic)ServerFluid dynamicsState (computer science)Type (biology)Fluid queueMarkov chainPoint (geometry)Property (philosophy)IdleMathematical optimizationQueueing theoryAlgorithmMathematicsComputer networkMechanicsOperating systemPhysicsGeometryGeologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study a MAP-modulated fluid flow model under generalized server vacation policies and propose factorization properties that can be efficiently used to derive the fluid level distributions at an arbitrary time point. Our model is an extension of the conventional Markov modulated fluid flow (MMFF) model to control the servers idle state. We consider two types of fluid increases: vertical increase (Type-V) and linear increase (Type-L). We first describe the MAP-modulated fluid flow model under server vacation policies and prove the factorization principle for each type. Based on the factorization formulae, we derive recursive formulae for performance measures. Lastly, some application examples of the factorization property are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation ReviewSame topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207