MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis: Keys to Early Diagnosis

2001· article· en· W1988204557 on OpenAlex
Meenesh A. Bhimani, James F. Wenz, Frank J. Frassica

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPigmented villonodular synovitisMedicineJoint effusionMagnetic resonance imagingDifferential diagnosisRadiologySynovitisAcetabulumPhysical examinationRadiographyRange of motionEffusionHemosiderinSurgeryPathologyArthritisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pigmented villonodular synovitis is a synovial proliferative disorder that remains a diagnostic difficulty. Many clues in the history, physical examination, and radiographic studies can aid in the diagnosis. A patient in the third or fourth decade of life often will present with vague monoarticular complaints. Symptoms include intermittent, extreme deep pain localized to the hip, occasionally relieved by position. Decreased active and passive range of motion may be found. Small erosions in the head of the femur and acetabulum may occur early in the course of the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging modality of choice and will show the characteristic findings of a joint effusion, synovial proliferation, and bulging of the hip. The synovial lining has a low signal on T1- and T2-weighted images, secondary to hemosiderin deposition. Pigmented villonodular synovitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of young patients with unexplained hip pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it