MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988249070 · doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e3283232c69

Predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation in a cohort of 5123 cardiac surgical patients

2009· article· en· W1988249070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Cislaghi, Anna Maria Condemi, Alberto Corona

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMechanical ventilationPerioperativeOdds ratioConfidence intervalEjection fractionProspective cohort studyHeart failureLogistic regressionInternal medicineCardiac surgeryCohortCohort studyCardiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) after heart surgery is associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study the aim was to assess PMV predictors and its impact on ICU, hospital length of stay and survival in cardiac surgical patients admitted to our eight-bed ICU from January 2000 to December 2006. All perioperative patient variables were put into an electronic database. Five thousand one hundred and twenty-three patients were divided into two cohorts: early extubation, undergoing a successful extubation for 12 h or less, and delayed extubation, needing a mechanical ventilation for more than 12 h. RESULTS: A logistic regression model identified the following as PMV predictors: age more than 65 years [odds ratio (OR), 1.296; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.017-1.069; P = 0.016], chronic renal failure (OR, 1.571; 95% CI, 1.566-2.466; P = 0.011), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.453; 95% CI, 1.695-2.454; P = 0.006), redo surgery (OR, 2.010; 95% CI, 1.389- 2.114; P = 0.001), emergency surgery (OR, 1.622; 95% CI, 1.515-2.494; P = 0.016), New York Heart Association/Canadian Cardiovascular Society class higher than 2 (OR, 1.491; 95% CI, 1.704-2.321; P = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less (OR, 2.125; 95% CI, 1.379-1.991; P = 0.000), red blood cell (OR, 5.430; 95% CI, 3.636-8.130; P = 0.000) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion units more than four (OR, 3.019; 95% CI, 1.808-5.050; P = 0.000) and cardiopulmonary bypass time more than 77 min (OR, 2.030; 95% CI, 1.248-2.174; P = 0.002). Early extubation group patients showed a higher probability of being discharged from ICU to cardiac surgical ward (log-rank = 1108.951; P = 0.000) and from cardiac to rehabilitation ward (log-rank = 598.005; P = 0.000) and higher hospital survival (log-rank = 53.215; P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: This review allowed us to assess predictors, helping us to identify 'a priori' patients more likely to undergo PMV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of AnaesthesiologySame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207