MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988288185 · doi:10.1163/15685292-12341256

León Ferrari’s Hell

2013· article· en· W1988288185 on OpenAlexaff
Todd Porterfield

Bibliographic record

VenueReligion and the Arts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyModernism (music)ArtArt historyTheme (computing)Latin AmericansOrder (exchange)IllusionOppressionReligious studiesHumanitiesPhilosophyLiteraturePolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The myth of modernism holds that the process of desacralization was its most emblematic and pervasive effect. However, far from being forgotten in the work of Argentinian conceptualist León Ferrari, religion has had an essential place in it for five decades. This essay sets out to trace the theme of hell in Ferrari’s work, which the artist has linked to oppression and violence in Latin America, Viet Nam, and Iraq, in order to demonstrate the persistence and centrality of religion in Ferrari’s art and in the Argentine milieu, thereby disavowing the illusion that we have been living in a sustained period of secularism that is only now being supplanted by a global return to religion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligion and the ArtsSame topicReligion and Society in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207