Adaptive neural data‐based compensation control of non‐linear systems with dynamic uncertainties and input saturation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an adaptive neural backstepping control scheme is proposed for a class of strict‐feedback non‐linear systems with unmodelled dynamics, dynamic disturbances and input saturation. To solve the difficulties from the unmodelled dynamics and input saturation, a dynamic signal and smooth function in non‐affine structure subject to the control input signal are introduced, respectively. Radial basis function (RBF) neural networks are used to approximate the packaged unknown non‐linearities, and an adaptive neural control approach is developed via backstepping, which guarantees that all the signals in the closed‐loop system are semi‐globally uniformly ultimately bounded in mean square. The main contributions of this note lie in that a control strategy is provided for a class of strict‐feedback non‐linear systems with unmodelled dynamics uncertainties and input saturation, and the proposed control scheme does not require any information of the bound of input saturation non‐linearity. Simulation results are used to show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it