Des Espèces de l’origine : le feuilleton scientifique de Louis Figuier dans La Presse de 1862
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la foulée de travaux ayant exploré la rhétoricité du feuilleton littéraire dans la presse du XIXe siècle, cette étude se penche sur la rhétorique du feuilleton scientifique de Louis Figuier, célèbre vulgarisateur sous le Second Empire et sous la Troisième République. Afin de voir comment Figuier traite une question très controversée à l’époque, soit l’origine des espèces, cette étude examine les livraisons de l’année 1862 de LaRevue scientifique de Figuier. Cette année est particulièrement riche en rebondissements scientifiques car L’origine des espèces paraît en traduction et d’importantes fouilles françaises sonnent le glas des théories fixistes de l’époque. Cette étude démontre tout ce que la plume de Figuier doit à certains dispositifs argumentatifs quand elle se trouve confrontée à la complexité de l’évolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".