MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988390015 · doi:10.1021/bi802121g

Label-Free Assay for Thermodynamic Analysis of Protein−Ligand Interactions: A Multivariate Strategy for Allosteric Ligand Screening

2008· article· en· W1988390015 on OpenAlexaff
Jennilee M. A. Gavina, Mohammad T. Mazhab‐Jafari, Giuseppe Melacini, Philip Britz‐McKibbin

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllosteric regulationChemistryLigand (biochemistry)Dissociation constantPlasma protein bindingCapillary electrophoresisDissociation (chemistry)Protein ligandBiophysicsBiochemistryChromatographyPhysical chemistryBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The binding of allosteric ligands to protein can induce changes to the holoprotein conformation, stability, and activity that have an impact on unfolding dynamics. Herein we report a label-free strategy for determining the dissociation constant of protein-ligand interactions over a wide dynamic range (>10(4), Kd from nano- to millimolar) using capillary electrophoresis that overcomes the constraints of an ideal two-state protein unfolding model. Multivariate analysis of thermodynamic parameters associated with holoprotein unfolding and ligand binding is demonstrated for the classification of cyclic nucleotide analogues that function as allosteric modulators of regulatory proteins, such as the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207