Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and sucrose concentrations on<i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>root architecture and anatomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of elevated carbon dioxide and sucrose concentrations on Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh root growth, morphology, and architecture. Two levels of CO2, 360 (ambient) and 900 (elevated) μmol·mol–1, and various sucrose concentrations were used. A. thaliana plants grown on a phytagar medium in small chambers with elevated CO2had longer roots, more lateral root growth and a more dichotomous branching pattern than plants grown in ambient CO2. Roots in elevated CO2had wider root diameters, and showed considerably more secondary growth such as larger diameter vascular cylinders and better-developed periderm. Addition of sucrose to the media closely resembled the effects of elevated CO2. Further, the increase in sucrose concentration had a more pronounced effect on root morphology under ambient, than elevated CO2. Thus, both elevated CO2and increased sucrose concentrations promote root growth by increasing their number, length, and diameter, and by changing the branching pattern from herringbone to dichotomous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".