MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988429376 · doi:10.1139/l10-040

Development of a new interconversion tool for hot mix asphalt (HMA) linear viscoelastic functions

2010· article· en· W1988429376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sheng Hu, Fujie Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)ViscoelasticityAlgorithmCollocation (remote sensing)Applied mathematicsRelaxation (psychology)Computer scienceLevenberg–Marquardt algorithmLeast-squares function approximationCurve fittingModuliMathematicsStatisticsEstimatorArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relaxation modulus E(t), creep compliance D(t), and complex modulus E*(ω) are functions often used to characterize the linear viscoelastic (LVE) behavior of hot mix asphalt (HMA). Interconversions among these LVE functions are often required. To perform an interconversion, one of the key steps is to express both the source and target LVE functions in Prony series representations. To obtain the corresponding Prony series coefficients, the collocation method and linear least squares method were often used in the past. However, the problem encountered with these two methods is in manually assigning part of the Prony series coefficients; resulting in unrealistic or negative Prony coefficients and big discrepancies between the fitting data and the original data. To address this problem, this paper developed a new algorithm by incorporating the Levenberg–Marquardt method. This new algorithm has four unique features, it (1) allows all the Prony series coefficients to be freely adjustable, (2) guarantees all positive Prony series coefficients, (3) determines all Prony series coefficients automatically and simultaneously, and (4) ensures very accurate interconversion through the fact that the fitting curve almost completely coincides with the original curve. Furthermore, to facilitate the implementation of practical applications of this new algorithm, it was incorporated into a stand-alone, windows-based software named “LVEmaster”. The simplicity and accuracy of this new interconversion software was demonstrated through a series of interconversions among HMA LVE functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207