MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988437384 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6090704

Statistical characterization of complex-valued EEG spectrum during mental imagery tasks

2011· article· en· W1988437384 on OpenAlexaff
Amirhossein S. Aghaei, Mohammad Shahin Mahanta, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, S. Pasupathy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographySpectral densityComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGaussianPattern recognition (psychology)Spectrum (functional analysis)Statistical modelSpeech recognitionPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings of brain activities can be processed in order to augment the brain's cognitive, sensory, or motor functionality. A representative, yet analytically tractable, model is essential to EEG processing. Several studies have examined different statistical models for EEG power spectrum. But recent studies have shown that not only the power, but also the phase of the spectrum, carries relevant information on brain activities. As a result, this paper focuses on the complex-valued spectrum of EEG, and proposes a general non-circularly-symmetric multivariate Gaussian model for this spectrum. This simple model can encapsulate the information in both power and phase of the spectrum, and its validity for EEG data has been verified using standard statistical tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207