MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TCRδ Gene Rearrangements Revealed by Fine Structure of the Recombination Junction in Mice

2003· article· en· W1988441628 on OpenAlexaff
Yasuyoshi Kanari, Masahiro Muto, Hideo Yamagishi

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology and Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsT-cell receptorDeltaBiologyRecombination signal sequencesGeneMolecular biologyRecombinationNucleic acid sequenceNucleotideGeneticsRecombination-activating geneT cellPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The standard products of V(D)J recombination of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes are two kinds of DNA junction, a coding joint and a signal joint. TCR delta V-D and D-D signal joints in adult mouse thymocytes were sequenced following PCR amplification. We observed differential nucleotide insertions at the V delta-D delta signal joints, depending on the V delta and D delta gene usage in the developmental stage. Nucleotide insertions at the V delta-D delta 1 signal joints were less frequent for the V delta 4, 5 genes preferentially utilized in adult thymocytes than for the V delta 3, 6 genes, infrequently rearranged to D delta 1. In addition to standard signal joints, unexpectedly, novel nonstandard products, "replacement joints" of D delta 1 substituted downstream by the recombination signal sequence of V delta were also found. However, no D delta 2-associated replacement joints other than V delta 5 were found. The other replacement joints of D delta 1-D delta 2 recombination were also observed. The mutation in TCR beta gene affected the frequency of nucleotide insertions at the V delta-D delta signal joints and inhibited the formation of replacement joint. Recombination mechanism generating the replacement joint and the possible role of TCR beta in up-regulation of TCR delta gene rearrangements are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology and ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207