Modulation of morphine analgesia by site-specific N -methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists: dependence on sex, site of antagonism, morphine dose, and time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmacological blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors can modulate morphine analgesia in experimental animals and humans. However, this literature is highly inconsistent, with NMDA receptor antagonists variously shown to potentiate, attenuate or produce no effect on morphine analgesic magnitude. A number of factors influencing this modulation have been proposed, but no one has examined such factors simultaneously, and all existing studies in mice were conducted exclusively in male subjects. Thus, the influence of systemic administration of site-specific NMDA receptor antagonists-including dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, MK-801, LY235959, L-701,324, and Ro 25-6981-on morphine analgesia (15-45 mg/kg; 15, 30 and 60 min post-injection) was studied in male and female mice using the 49 degrees C tail-withdrawal test. We found that oral and intraperitoneal dextromethorphan, a low-affinity non-competitive antagonist, dose-dependently potentiated low-dose morphine analgesia but attenuated high-dose morphine analgesia. Dextrorphan and MK-801 were found to potentiate low- but not high-dose morphine analgesia. The competitive glutamate-site antagonist, LY235959, and glycine-site antagonist, L-701,324, potentiated morphine analgesia at all doses. In contrast, the polyamine (NR2B) site antagonist, Ro 25-6981, attenuated morphine analgesia at all doses. Strikingly, the non-competitive antagonists produced no modulation of morphine analgesia whatsoever in female mice, whereas no sex differences were observed using competitive or NR2B antagonists. These findings indicate that NMDA modulation of morphine analgesia is critically influenced by sex, site of antagonism, morphine dose and time after injection. Our data suggest that NMDA antagonism via competitive or glycine site antagonism might result in more reliable clinical effects on morphine analgesia in both sexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".