MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988454479 · doi:10.1021/jp0308256

A Study of the Formation of Molecular Sieve SAPO-44

2004· article· en· W1988454479 on OpenAlexaff
Yining Huang, David Machado, Christopher W. Kirby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular sieveMagic angle spinningCrystallizationMoleculePorosityNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCrystallographyRaman spectroscopyChemistryDiffractionMaterials scienceCatalysisStereochemistryOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of a silicoaluminophosphate-based molecular sieve SAPO-44 has been investigated in the present study. Particular attention was directed toward the characterization of the intermediate phases formed at different stages during the synthesis. The changes in the long-range ordering of the gel phases as a function of crystallization time was monitored by powder X-ray diffraction, and the development of the local structure of P, Al, and Si atoms was followed by 31 P, 27 Al, and 29 Si magic-angle spinning NMR. 1 H → 31 P cross polarization (CP) was employed to differentiate the P sites in different phases coexisting in the sample. Several 27 Al/ 31 P and 27 Al/ 29 Si double-resonance NMR experiments such as CP and transferred echo double-resonance were also utilized to identify the nature of the intermediate phases, and to select the P−O−Al and Si−O−Al bonding connectivities. FT-Raman spectroscopy was used to gain the information regarding the evolution of the porosity in the framework and the immediate environments around the template molecules. On the basis of the experimental results, a possible route for the formation of SAPO-44 is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207