MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988477452 · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815ce3

The Effect of Propofol Concentration on Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization in Children

2008· article· en· W1988477452 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Hume‐Smith, Shubhayan Sanatani, Joanne Lim, Anthony Chau, Simon D. Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePropofolQT intervalAnesthesiaTorsades de pointesRepolarizationRandomized controlled trialPolypharmacyAnalysis of varianceElectrocardiographyConfidence intervalCardiologyInternal medicineElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: QT interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram (ECG) may be drug-induced and is traditionally associated with torsades des pointes. A better predictor of torsades des pointes is the time interval between the peak and the end of the T-wave (Tp-e). Older studies of propofol's effect on the corrected interval (QTc) are conflicting and confounded by polypharmacy. It was recently shown that target-controlled infusion of propofol at 3 microg/mL has no effect on QTc or Tp-e. This plasma concentration of propofol is at the extreme lower end of the range for surgical anesthesia. In this randomized, double-blind, clinical study, we investigated the dose-response relationship between propofol, QTc, and Tp-e in a range of doses clinically relevant for surgical anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty healthy unpremedicated children, aged 3-10 yr, were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive target-controlled infusions of propofol, to achieve 1 of 3 plasma concentrations: 3, 4.5, and 6 microg/mL. A preoperative 12 lead ECG was performed and repeated 5 min after induction. Two investigators, blinded to group allocation and to the timing of the ECG traces, independently measured QTc and Tp-e within and between each group. Paired t-tests were used to compare QTc and Tp-e within groups. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup analysis. The primary outcome measure was a change of >25 ms in Tp-e both within and between groups. RESULTS: ECG recordings were obtained in 51 children. There were no demographic or ECG differences at baseline, at which time QTc and Tp-e values were within normal limits. There were no differences in QTc or Tp-e after induction within or between the three different groups. DISCUSSION: Propofol has no effect on myocardial repolarization in healthy children at clinically relevant doses. This suggests that propofol would be a rational choice for children with a preexisting repolarization abnormality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207