MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988477812 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2012.6503726

Theoretical performance bounds for reduced-order linear and nonlinear distributed estimation

2012· article· en· W1988477812 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityComputer scienceNonlinear systemMonte Carlo methodComputationUpper and lower boundsMathematical optimizationNode (physics)Cramér–Rao boundWireless sensor networkAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Estimation theoryMathematicsApplied mathematicsStatisticsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In sensor networks deployed over large-scale, multidimensional physical systems with limited spatial observability, reduced-order, distributed estimation is a practical alternative to centralized estimation. For such reduced-order systems, centralized computation of the posterior Cramér Rao lower bound (CRLB) is not possible as the global estimate of the entire state vector is not accessible at a single processing node. We derive the distributed PCRLB (dPCRLB) implementations encompassing both linear and nonlinear reduced-order dynamical systems and verify their optimality through Monte Carlo simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it