MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editors’ Report, December 2008

2009· article· en· W1988545001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
AF Cohen, YK Loke, LD Lewis, M Schachter, Andrew A. Somogyi, JM Ritter

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiptLibrary scienceMedicinePublishingFamily medicinePolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During 2008 BJCP published 182 (+6% compared with 2007) original research papers (including 23 short reports); 15 reviews (+36%); 1 review of 2007; 9 commentaries (including 1 historical commentary); 12 Editors’ Views; 1 Editors’ report; 56 letters (+100%); 8 book reviews and 1 obituary. There was one themed issue on ‘Cardiovascular Clinical Pharmacology’. Proceedings of the Clinical Section of the BPS and abstracts of the Dutch Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmacy meeting (March 2007), and Dutch Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Biosciences meeting (April 2008) were published. We received 388 (−1%) original submissions, of which 345 were full papers and 43 were short reports. Of this total 83 have been accepted and 186 rejected; the rest are pending a decision or awaiting revision. The end of the year rejection rate is therefore 48%, increased by 8% from 2007 when it was 40%. Submissions from 1/11/07 to 31/10/08 came from 47 (+14%) countries: UK (54;−19%), France (32;+19%), China (30;+43%), Netherlands (27;−13%), Australia (25;+25%), USA (25;−26%), India (19;−5%), Japan (18;unchanged), Denmark (14;+40%), Canada (13;+30%), Germany (13;+30%), Italy (13;−32%) and 35 other countries (<10 submissions each). Papers are submitted and handled electronically via the Manuscript Central website. Median times were: from submission to first decision: 41 days (range 0–149); from receipt by the referee to return of their report: 13 days (range 0–85); from submission to acceptance: 86 days (range 0–329); from receipt at Blackwell Publishing to Early View publication: 44.7 days from receipt at Blackwell Publishing to print publication: 90.7 days The timelines were virtually unchanged from 2007 although we managed to reduce the overall receipt to print time by 8 days. The Impact Factor is 2.68, similar to 2007. Jim Ritter (London, KCL) took over from Jeff Aronson (Oxford) as editor in chief. Evan Begg (Christchurch) completed his tenure as the founding Australasian editor: the Journal, the society and the publishers are extremely grateful to him. Andrew Somogyi (Adelaide) was appointed in his stead. Lionel Lewis's term as American editor has been extended. Yoon Loke replaced Jim Ritter as European editor. James McLay (Aberdeen), Una Martin (Birmingham), Andrew McLachlan (Sydney), Edmund Lee (Singapore), Terry Blaschke (California), Gerd Mikus (Heidelberg), Ray MacAllister (UC London) and Emma Baker (St George's London) joined the executive editorial board. Andrew Somogyi demitted to take up the Australasian editorship. Leon Aarons (Manchester) and John Miners (Adelaide) each completed exceptionally long and active terms of service for which the Journal is very grateful. Xia (Connie) Chen has been extremely helpful to the Journal by providing correct Mandarin translations of the sections that accompany each article describing what it adds, which we hope will increase exposure of the scientific papers in China. We are encouraged by the increase in submissions from mainland China and in due course we hope to appoint executive editors from this important region. After a careful selection process completed by a working party of the BPS with the help of Mark Ware, an external consultant, the contract with Wiley Blackwell was renewed for a further 8 years. Wiley Blackwell is now also the publisher for the BJP and this opens interesting prospects for collaboration between the two journals. Reviews are of great importance to BJCP. To build on our position in this area it has been agreed to form a reviews board under the chairmanship of Derek Waller (Southampton) acting in concert with the reviews editor (Mike Schachter, Imperial College, London). Founder members all have considerable editorial experience with the Journal: Martin Lennard (Sheffield), Richard Donnelly (Nottingham), Munir Pirmohamed (Liverpool), and Leon Aarons (Manchester). In addition the board will benefit from the experience of the BJP reviews board editor Mike Curtis (KCL). Their role is to widen the appeal of the journal, promote it at conferences that the publishers cannot attend, write reviews and act as reviewers. Albert Frauman (Melbourne) and John Miners (Adelaide) joined the international editorial board. The Editors thank all Board Members, both Executive Editors and International Editors, for their continuing enthusiastic and competent contributions over the past year. The Journal Management Board met in person three times in 2008. Monthly teleconferences between senior editors and publisher were initiated in August. The editors wish to acknowledge the support of several key individuals: Michael Willis Editorial Services Manager, Editorial Assistant Carys Thurlby, Production Editor James Martin and his successor Martin Childs, and Phil Wright (Marketing) have been key members of the team, overseen as always with calm efficiency by our publisher Elizabeth Whelan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1790.159

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207