MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Hybrid Optical Correlator Used as an Intelligent Instrument

2005· article· en· W1988546448 on OpenAlexaff
S. Chang, Chander P. Grover

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical correlatorComputer scienceSpatial light modulatorFlexibility (engineering)Spatial filterFilter (signal processing)Optical filterArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareComputer visionEngineeringFourier transformOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid correlation system incorporates an optical correlator, spatial light modulators(SLM), digital cameras and a computer. Spatial light modulators and cameras are used to dynamically update the input and the spatial filter. The hybrid correlation system integrates the parallel processing capability of the optical correlator and the flexibility of the digital system. It can be used as a high-speed multi-function information processor. This paper focuses on the design and fabrication of a hybrid optical correlator and how it is used as an intelligent instrument. We address the issues of rigorous requirements for filter registration and matched filtering by proposing practical approaches. We include the analysis and use of intensity filters based on commercial SLMs for real-time pattern recognition. We present the engineering details of a specific hybrid optical correlator for applications to the real-time identification of an aircraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicAdvanced Optical Imaging TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207