Photothermal investigation of the thermal shock behavior of alumina ceramics for engine components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photothermal radiometric technique is used to measure the thermal properties of alumina ceramic materials (96% Al2O3/3% SiO2/0.9% MgO) treated by applying high temperature and high pressure, a process known as ASPRO conversion technology. Alumina ceramics subjected to ASPRO treatment have shown much higher thermal shock resistance than corresponding untreated ceramics. A theoretical model for thermal conduction in a three-layered sample, in which the thermal resistance at grain boundaries is taken into account, is developed to interpret the experimental data. The experimental results with both untreated and ASPRO treated ceramic samples show that the improvement in thermal shock behavior is the result of the reduction of thermal resistance between ceramic grain boundaries. The good agreement of the experimental results to the three-layered theoretical model indicates that the thermal-wave behavior of these samples is consistent with the presence of an inter-grain thermal boundary impedance which controls the thermal shock behavior of the alumina ceramics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".