MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988592217 · doi:10.1517/14728222.5.5.557

Cyclin-dependent kinases and stroke

2001· article· en· W1988592217 on OpenAlexafffund
Fuhu Wang, Michael J O’Hare

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Stroke NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCyclin-dependent kinaseKinaseCyclinCell cycleCell biologyStroke (engine)Programmed cell deathBiologyNeuroscienceCancer researchCellApoptosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are a group of enzymes predominately known for their role in cell cycle regulation in proliferating cell types. Increasing evidence, however, suggests that CDKs also promote death in neurones. These observations have lead to the notion that CDKs may serve as a therapeutic target for neuropathological conditions such as stroke. Accordingly, in this review, we will examine the evidence which indicates a role for CDKs in neuronal death and evaluate the potential of CDK inhibitors as a therapeutic target for stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic TargetsSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207