MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988611692 · doi:10.1243/09544100jaero541

Modelling, simulation, and experimental evaluation of a crossflow heat exchanger for an aircraft environmental control system

2009· article· en· W1988611692 on OpenAlexafffund
Shoaib Shah, G Liu, David R. Greatrix

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHeat exchangerPlate fin heat exchangerHeat transferEnvironmental control systemMechanicsNTU methodHeat capacity ratePlate heat exchangerMoving bed heat exchangerMicro heat exchangerHeat transfer coefficientMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crossflow heat exchangers play a significant role in the operation of an aircraft's environmental control system (ECS). The bleed air supplied by an aircraft engine, at high pressure and high temperature, requires regulation and control in order to be used for various pneumatic services. In the present investigation, the transient temperature response of crossflow plate-and-fin ECS heat exchangers, having a large core capacity with both fluids unmixed, is investigated numerically and experimentally for perturbations experienced in temperature. A non-linear lumped model of crossflow heat exchangers with a state-space solution valid for equal fluid velocities is derived and evaluated, in terms of fluid placement and number of lumps (sections) required. Dependency of the heat transfer coefficient on flowrates is incorporated in the dynamic modelling of the heat exchanger. Two models are derived, and the variation of the mean exit temperatures of both fluids with time is compared for the two alternative models, with consideration of the number of transfer units and heat capacitance rate ratios. One model requires axial lumping of the primary surface alone, as done in most of the existing models, and the second involves incorporating the effect of secondary surfaces (fins) on the heat exchanger transient performance. To quantify the importance of modelling the fins, a comparison of both simulation models with experimentally obtained data from a physical model is presented. By including fins and complex non-linearities in modelling of the ECS heat exchangers, a precise representation of the heat exchanger dynamics and accurate temperature responses are predicted. The model developments reported in this article can lead to improved aircraft ECS design and optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace EngineeringSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207