Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les grandes traditions sont souvent présentées comme étant des formes théâtrales figées, archaïques, très codées et fortement inscrites dans le tissu d’une culture. À un point tel qu’on en vient parfois à confondre tradition théâtrale et folklore. Pourtant, ce que l’on nomme le « système » de Stanislavski peut aujourd’hui être considéré comme une tradition théâtrale, de même que la biomécanique de Meyerhold et le mime corporel de Decroux. Peut-on en dire autant du burlesque québécois et du théâtre expérimental de Jean-Pierre Ronfard et de Robert Gravel ? Ces pratiques représentent-elles des traditions propres à la culture québécoise ? Qu’est-ce qu’une tradition théâtrale ? Un point de vue sur le théâtre, une pensée artistique ou une manière de faire ? Cet article tente de répondre à certaine de ces questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".