Permeable Pavement Design and Construction: What Have We Learned Recently?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permeable pavements have been gaining popularity throughout North America. Permeable pavements typically consist of pervious concrete, porous asphalt, or permeable interlocking concrete block paving units over an open grade base/subbase layer(s). Permeable pavements are designed to infiltrate stormwater, reduce peak flows, filter and clean contaminants in the water stream, and promote groundwater recharge. They have become an integral part of low-impact design and best management practices for stormwater management. To be effective, permeable pavements must be designed to provide sufficient structural capacity to accommodate the anticipated vehicle loadings and deal with stormwater flowing into and out of the permeable pavement. While there have been many well designed and constructed permeable pavements, this is a relatively new technology and there have been some "issues" with their performance. This paper describes some of the basics of best practices, design, construction, and maintenance considerations for permeable pavement design and construction and focuses on best practices of permeable pavement design and construction in North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".