On formal models for cognitive linguistics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive linguistics is an emerging discipline that studies the cognitive properties of natural languages and the cognitive models of languages in computational linguistics, cognitive computing, and computational intelligence. This paper presents the theoretical framework of cognitive linguistics in order to systematically formalize the syntaxes and grammars of natural languages. An abstract language model of cognitive linguistics is created at the top level. Based on it, the cognitive structures of languages at the levels of lexis, phrase, clauses, sentence, paragraph, and essay are formally modeled from the bottom up. Using contemporary denotational mathematics, the deductive grammar of English is formally modeled and rigorously analyzed. The basic research provides support for a wide range of applications in computational linguistics, cognitive informatics, online text processing, web search engines, machine language comprehension, autonomous machine learning, smart cell phones, semantic computing, and computing with words.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it