MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988712436 · doi:10.1021/cm7024119

“Smart” Self-Assembled Quantum Dots Regulate and Stabilize Structure in Phase-Separated Polymer Blends

2007· article· en· W1988712436 on OpenAlexaff
Yunyong Guo, Matthew G. Moffitt

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolystyrenePolymerMethyl methacrylateQuantum dotAnnealing (glass)Chemical engineeringPolymer blendSelf-assemblyPhotoluminescenceSpin coatingPhase inversionPhase (matter)Polymer chemistryNanotechnologyCoatingCopolymerMembraneComposite materialOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cadmium sulfide (CdS) quantum dots (QDs) coated with mixed polystyrene (PS)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) brush layers (PS/PMMA–CdS) self-assemble at the polymer/polymer interface of a phase-separating blend of the corresponding homopolymers, forming an encapsulating shell surrounding PMMA islands in a PS matrix. The segregated QDs regulate phase separation during spin-coating and dramatically stabilize the spin-coated blend morphologies during subsequent annealing, compared to neat PS:PMMA blends which undergo rapid phase inversion and coarsening. PS/PMMA–CdS QDs are shown to retain their photoluminescence following interfacial self-assembly and subsequent annealing. Free-standing arrays of polymer/QD rings formed via directed self-assembly can be developed by selective solvent washing and removal of homopolymers from the spin-coated films. This work demonstrates the principle that colloidal inorganic elements such as QDs, along with possessing interesting optical properties, can also play a key role in the self-organization and stability of polymer blend-based devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207