Experimental optimization of an <i>in situ</i> forming hydrogel for hemorrhage control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fabrication of a novel in situ forming hydrogel composed of a multifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (NHS) and poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAA) was investigated. FTIR confirmed that PAA formed the hydrogel matrix (i.e., the formation of a PAA-like hydrogel). A factorial experiment was conducted to identify the key parameters that controlled gelation time, gel content, and swelling properties. The type of PEG (e.g., 4- and 6-arm) appeared to play a major role in determining all three performance parameters, with the greatest effect on gelation time. Other influencing factors include (a) the PEG concentration, which contributes to the gelation time and gel content; (b) pH of the buffer used for dissolving each polymer, which can affect the gelation time; and (c) PAA molecular weights, which contribute to the gel content and swelling. The concentration of PAA solution had no significant effects on hydrogel formation and properties within the investigated range, presumably due to negligible changes in the crosslinking density of the hydrogels. The PAA buffer pH influenced the gel content as well. Finally, thromboelastography was used to examine the effects of each polymer and their in situ gelation on blood coagulation in vitro. All individual polymers tested reduced clot strength, while the gelation of the polymers enhanced overall procoagulant effects. These results suggest that the biomaterial can be optimized to provide a combination of rapid gelation and swelling properties suitable for hemorrhage control and thus warrant further studies in animal bleeding models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it