MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988727503 · doi:10.1080/15321810903084863

Dose-Dependent Inhibition of BrdU Detection in the Cell Proliferation ELISA by Culture Medium Proteins

2009· article· en· W1988727503 on OpenAlexaff
Lauriane Padet, Isabelle St‐Amour, Éric Aubin, Dominic Paquin‐Proulx, Renée Bazin, Réal Lemieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHéma-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyMonoclonal antibodyCell growthDNABromodeoxyuridineCell cultureCellChemistryDeoxyuridineDenaturation (fissile materials)AntibodyBiologyBiochemistryImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determination of the proliferation rate of cultured mammalian cells is widely done using incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine into replicating DNA followed by quantitative detection in ELISA using a specific monoclonal antibody. However, we noted that the BrdU ELISA results did not correlate with viable cell counts when increasing concentrations of proteins were added to test their effects on proliferating cells. This observation suggested that proteins could interfere with BrdU incorporation or detection in the commercial BrdU ELISA used. We show here that the presence of exogenous proteins during cell fixation and DNA denaturation significantly inhibited BrdU detection presumably by coating the extracted DNA by a concentration-dependent protein film. A simple modification to the manufacturer's protocol (cell washing) permitted to avoid this interference and resulted in a significant increase of the assay sensitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Immunoassay and ImmunochemistrySame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207