Examining Protein Structure and Similarities by Spectral Analysis Technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spectral envelope, a frequency based technique for analyzing categorical time series, is applied to amino acid sequences to examine their periodicity. The periodic signatures of such sequences is related to the secondary structure of the folding patterns in the gene. For a pair of sequences, we define a spectral envelope covariance which emphasizes the common periodicities in the two sequences. This is used to give a similarity measure for the two sequences which can then be used in a neighbour joining algorithm to construct a phylogeny. We apply the spectral methods to myoglobin sequences from primates and cetaceans. The spectral envelope reflects the structure of this protein and the tree constructed using spectral methods shows strong agreement with published trees. The spectral envelope can be used to explore similarities between and within different protein families. Since we do not require aligned sequences, the spectral methods can be used to create phylogenies across different protein families. We apply the method to 11 protein families from PANDIT obtaining a tree where the families are separated and the relationship among the families is given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it