MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988736729 · doi:10.1080/15659801.2013.853435

Gene-culture co-evolution: teaching, learning, and correlations between relatives

2013· article· en· W1988736729 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus W. Feldman, F. Christiansen, Sarah P. Otto

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Journal of Ecology and Evolution · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeritabilityAssortative matingPhenotypeGeneticsBiologyAlleleOffspringGenotypeGeneAdditive genetic effectsQuantitative geneticsEvolutionary biologyGenetic variationMating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritability, the fraction of phenotypic variance attributable to the action of genes, is usually derived from a linear statistical partition of variance. In this paper we study a dichotomous phenotype whose transmission from parents to offspring depends on the parents’ phenotypes and the offspring’s genotype. Each individual is then represented as a phenogenotype. We derive expressions for each component of phenotypic variance and for covariances between relatives of various degrees. The resulting heritability estimates vary with the rates of phenotypic transmission as well as with the genetic contribution to the phenotype. Assortative mating by phenotype in parents is also shown to contribute to the correlations between relatives. In addition, we show that the frequency of alleles at genes affecting the phenotypes strongly affects standard heritability measures. This is important because for most complex traits these allele frequencies cannot be ascertained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsrael Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207