MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988738633 · doi:10.5380/avs.v11i3.7425

ESTUDO DO GENE DO HORMÔNIO DE CRESCIMENTO EM UMA POPULAÇÃO DE BÚFALAS DA RAÇA MURRAH (Bubalus bubalis)

2006· article· pt· W1988738633 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Garrido, André Luiz Julien Ferraz, Humberto Tonhati, J. D. Senna, A. R. Otaviano

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Veterinary Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBubalusBiologyMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O hormônio GH é um dos principais reguladores do crescimento pós-natal e do metabolismo em mamíferos, sendo proposto como gene candidato para identificação de marcadores genéticosrelacionados a características de crescimento, carcaça e produção de leite. Dessa forma, o presente estudo objetivou estudar possíveis polimorfismos na parte final da região 5´-flanqueadora, primeiro exon e parte do primeiro intron do gene do hormônio de crescimento de uma população de búfalas da raça Murrah, buscando futuras associações com características de produção de leite e seus constituintes. Para tanto, foram utilizadas amostras de sangue de 115 búfalas. Mediante reação em cadeia da polimerase (PCR), foi amplificado um fragmento com 450 pb, o qual foi analisado pela técnica de seqüenciamento e de RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism), utilizando a endonuclease de restrição DdeI. Como resultado, a seqüência denucleotídeos do gene GH de búfalos será submetida a GenBank. No entanto, verificou-se que os bubalinos apresentaram monomorfismo, para a região estudada, do gene do hormônio de crescimento. Assim sendo, não foi possível quantificar a ação desse gene sobre a produção de leite e seus constituintes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Veterinary ScienceSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207