MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988760867 · doi:10.2166/wqrjc.2014.034

Computational fluid dynamics simulation and parametric study of an open channel ultra-violet wastewater disinfection reactor

2014· article· en· W1988760867 on OpenAlexafffund
Rajib Saha, Madhumita B. Ray, Chao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsVolume of fluid methodBaffleParametric statisticsMATLABFluentChannel (broadcasting)MechanicsLagrangian particle trackingWastewaterComputer scienceSimulationNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsEnvironmental engineeringMathematicsFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The disinfection characteristics of an open channel ultra-violet (UV) disinfection reactor is investigated numerically. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model used in this study is based on the volume of fluid (VOF) method to capture the water–air interface. The Lagrangian particle tracking method is used to calculate the microbial particle trajectory and the discrete ordinate (DO) model is used to calculate the UV intensity field inside the reactor. A commercial CFD software package ANSYS FLUENT is used to solve the governing equations. Custom user defined functions (UDFs) are developed to calculate the UV doses. A post-processor is developed in MATLAB to implement the inactivation kinetics of the microbes. The post-processor provides the probabilistic dose distribution and reduction equivalent dose (RED) values achievable in the reactor. The numerical predictions are compared with available experimental data to validate the CFD model. A parametric study is performed to understand the effects of different parameters on disinfection performance of the reactor. The low/high dosed particle trajectories, which can provide an insight for hydraulic and optical characteristics of the reactor for possible design improvements, are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207