Attenuation of the 40-Hertz Auditory Steady State Response by Propofol Involves the Cortical and Subcortical Generators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 40-Hz auditory steady state response (40-Hz ASSR) provides a reliable marker of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness. Brain electric source analysis indicates that the 40-Hz ASSR arises from cortical and subcortical generators. The authors used source analysis to assess the effect of propofol anesthesia on the cerebral generators of the 40-Hz ASSR. They also examined the effect of propofol on two auditory evoked potentials of cortical origin: the N1 and the sustained potential. METHODS: Eleven healthy human volunteers were anesthetized with propofol given in target-concentration mode at the minimal concentration causing unconsciousness. The 40-Hz ASSR was recorded before, during, and after anesthesia. The source model consisted of five concurrently active generator dipoles: two in the contralateral auditory cortex (one tangentially oriented, one radially oriented), two in the ipsilateral auditory cortex (same orientations), and one in the midline brainstem. RESULTS: During anesthesia, the strength of the cortical and brainstem dipoles was reduced to the same extent (to 54% of baseline for the four cortical dipoles pooled vs. 53% for the brainstem dipole). Dipole strength during anesthesia was significantly less (P < 0.01) than during baseline and recovery for both cortical and brainstem dipoles. The N1 and sustained potential were no longer recordable during anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The attenuation of the 40-Hz ASSR during propofol anesthesia results from a reduction of similar magnitude of the activity of the cortical and brainstem generators. The N1 and sustained potential are so profoundly attenuated during propofol anesthesia that they are no longer recordable from the scalp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".