MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988773235 · doi:10.2118/158835-ms

Paper Title Reservoir Characteristics of Carboniferous Age Coals and Shale in the Cherokee Basin, Mid-Continent US, Results of 20 Years of Production

2012· article· en· W1988773235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven A. Tedesco

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCherokeeOil shaleCoalbed methaneStructural basinCarboniferousGeologyCoalCoal measuresMining engineeringCoal miningPetroleum engineeringGeochemistryHydrology (agriculture)ArchaeologyPaleontologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The coal bed methane industry has been present in the United States since at least the 1920s. The most recent surge in activity began in the 1980s and was driven by tax credits. In the 1990s rising gas prices increased activity in both the United States and Canada. Activity peaked and is presently in a very mature stage in the mid-2000s as shale gas replaced coal bed methane. Coalbed methane and shale gas production has been present in the Cherokee basin since the 1920s (Figure 1). The reservoirs are generally found from 80 meters to 650 meters with an average depth of 375 meters. Many wells will flow gas in a very short period of time and generally have low water production. Individual reservoirs tend to 0.6 to 1.2 meters thick and are of Desmoinesian age. Reservoir characteristics have only been defined post field development. The Cherokee basin now has 20 years of production history for over 5,000 wells which allows a more detail analysis of reservoir characteristics and what actual reserves are.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and ExhibitionSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207