MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988792261 · doi:10.1121/1.1312358

Acoustic radiation due to the inelastic impact of a sphere on a rectangular plate

2000· article· en· W1988792261 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe Troccaz, Roland Woodcock, Frédéric Laville

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNoise (video)Acoustic radiationAcousticsDiscretizationPoint (geometry)MechanicsDeformation (meteorology)RadiationPhysicsOpticsComputer scienceGeometryMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impact between two structures is an important source of noise in industry. However, it is not a well-known phenomenon from a theoretical point of view. The models available in the literature for impact noise often address only part of the phenomenon. In this paper, a more comprehensive model is developed. The acoustic radiation due to the inelastic impact of a sphere with a rectangular simply supported thin plate is formulated and validated experimentally. The impact force is calculated from Hertz's law, which has been extended to the case of plastic deformations, and the acoustic radiation in the time domain is obtained using Rayleigh's integral, the plate being discretized in rectangular elements. The model is used to show that the sound-radiation mechanism includes two separate sources: the initial deformation of the plate and the propagation of the bending waves. The model is also used to determine the contribution to impact noise of parameters that characterize the two impacting structures or the impact configuration such as plasticity, damping, materials, and impact velocity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207