Optimal <i>k</i>‐space sampling for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI with an application to MR renography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For time-resolved acquisitions with k-space undersampling, a simulation method was developed for selecting imaging parameters based on minimization of errors in signal intensity versus time and physiologic parameters derived from tracer kinetic analysis. Optimization was performed for time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) algorithm applied to contrast-enhanced MR renography. A realistic 4D phantom comprised of aorta and two kidneys, one healthy and one diseased, was created with ideal tissue time-enhancement pattern generated using a three-compartment model with fixed parameters, including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF). TWIST acquisitions with different combinations of sampled central and peripheral k-space portions were applied to this phantom. Acquisition performance was assessed by the difference between simulated signal intensity (SI) and calculated GFR and RPF and their ideal values. Sampling of the 20% of the center and 1/5 of the periphery of k-space in phase-encoding plane and data-sharing of the remaining 4/5 minimized the errors in SI (<5%), RPF, and GFR (both <10% for both healthy and diseased kidneys). High-quality dynamic human images were acquired with optimal TWIST parameters and 2.4 sec temporal resolution. The proposed method can be generalized to other dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI applications, e.g., MR angiography or cancer imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".