MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988849146 · doi:10.4171/cmh/33

A prime analogue of the Erdös--Pomerance conjecture for elliptic curves

2005· article· en· W1988849146 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu-Ru Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCommentarii Mathematici Helvetici · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsConjectureOrder (exchange)OmegaPrime (order theory)Rank (graph theory)ModuloDistribution (mathematics)Elliptic curvePrime number theoremPrime factorDiscrete mathematicsPrime numberPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let E/{\mathbb Q} be an elliptic curve of rank \ge 1 and b\in E({\mathbb Q}) a rational point of infinite order. For a prime p of good reduction, let g_b(p) be the order of the cyclic group generated by the reduction \bar b of b modulo p . We denote by \omega(g_b(p)) the number of distinct prime divisors of g_b(p) . Assuming the GRH, we show that the normal order of \omega(g_b(p)) is \log \log p . We also prove conditionally that there exists a normal distribution for the quantity \frac{\omega(g_b(p)) - \log \log p}{\sqrt{\log \log p}}. The latter result can be viewed as an elliptic analogue of a conjecture of Erdös and Pomerance about the distribution of \omega(f_a(n)) , where a is a natural number > 1 and f_a(n) the order of a modulo n .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommentarii Mathematici HelveticiSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207