Hope, Disclosure, and Control in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The parents of critically ill newborns who have been admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) generally face several challenges. Included in these challenges is the possibility of having access to information and a certain level of disclosure about the diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis for their newborn. A related challenge is the ability to have some control over the care of their newborn. In this article, I (first author) share my own experiences of having a child admitted to an NICU, and I discuss how a lack of disclosure affected the decision making and involvement I had in my child's care and hindered my ability to find hope. A loss of hope can both contribute to a sense of powerlessness and exacerbate the negative aspects of these NICU experiences. I argue that when health care providers offer parents the disclosure they want and need, as well as a certain amount of control over the care of their child while in the NICU, the ability of parents to find hope will be increased, and they will be better able to cope successfully in the NICU environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".