MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988862458 · doi:10.1139/o02-163

Secretion of foreign proteins mediated by chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences

2002· article· en· W1988862458 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gregory R. Lampard, Ann M. Verrinder Gibbins

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersUniversity of OxfordNorth Carolina State University
KeywordsLysozymeGeneBiologyGreen fluorescent proteinHeterologousTransgeneSecretionCell biologyRegulator geneRegulatory sequenceReporter geneGene targetingPlasmidMolecular biologyGeneticsRegulation of gene expressionGene expressionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploitation of the insulating properties of the complete chicken lysozyme gene domain may facilitate the production of transgenic chicken bioreactors with the capacity to deposit valuable proteins in the egg white. Chimeric genes consisting of the chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences and sequences encoding foreign proteins could be inserted randomly into the chicken genome and retain appropriate expression levels. The research reported here established that chicken lysozyme gene regulatory sequences can be used to direct the production and secretion of green fluorescent protein (used as a reporter protein) in transiently transfected chicken blastodermal cells. Attempts to verify these findings in transgenic hens are currently in progress. To provide a rapid means of generating constructs encoding other foreign proteins under the control of lysozyme gene regulatory sequences that can facilitate the secretion of heterologous proteins in vivo, a generic lysozyme gene regulatory scaffold was created using a poxvirus-mediated gene targeting system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207