MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988888488 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2223491

Voltage and Reactive Power Impacts on Successful Operation of Islanded Microgrids

2012· article· en· W1988888488 on OpenAlexaff
Farag, Morad Abdelaziz, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridDispatchable generationAC powerProbabilistic logicReliability (semiconductor)VoltageWind powerReliability engineeringPower (physics)Voltage optimisationEngineeringComputer scienceElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringDistributed generationRenewable energyElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a probabilistic technique to evaluate the success of islanded microgrids taking into consideration the impacts of voltage and reactive power constraints and the special features and operational characteristics of both dispatchable and wind distributed generators in islanded microgrids. New adequacy and reliability indices are proposed to account for the effect of voltage and reactive power constraints. To facilitate these studies, the proposed technique employs a microgrid model that reflects the special characteristics of microgrid operation. Simulation studies have been carried out to validate the proposed technique. The simulation results show that voltage and reactive power constraints have considerable effects on the microgrids successful operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207