MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988888742 · doi:10.1080/02739610802437202

Coping-Health Inventory for Parents: Assessing Coping Among Iranian Parents in the Care of Children With Cancer and Introductory Development of an Adapted Iranian Coping-Health Inventory for Parents

2008· article· en· W1988888742 on OpenAlex
Maria E. Aguilar‐Vafaie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren s Health Care · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Support in Illness
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsCoping (psychology)PsychologyHealth careClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The factorial structure of the Coping-Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) instrument was investigated. Predictive, discriminative, and concurrent validity was also examined. A sample of 75 mothers and fathers in the care of adolescents diagnosed with cancer living in Iran completed the CHIP as part of a large battery of measures. Exploratoty factor analysis yielded a 13-item, 3-factor model that conceptually replicated the dimensional structure of the original CHIP instrument. The newly adapted scales predicted adolescents' psychological adjustment beyond religious coping and gender of parent, and differentially predicted adaptive and nonadaptive coping styles. The 3-factor adapted CHIP measure offers preliminary evidence for generalizability of the dimensional structure of the CHIP to the Iranian social and cultural situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it