MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988910753 · doi:10.1089/hyb.2010.0124

Domain Recognition of the ING1 Tumor Suppressor by a Panel of Monoclonal Antibodies

2011· article· en· W1988910753 on OpenAlex
Donna Boland, Wei Gong, Karl Riabowol

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsNLSBiologyExonNuclear localization sequenceGeneGeneticsProtein domainNuclear proteinCell biologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inhibitor of growth (ING) family of proteins play key roles in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, cell aging, and the DNA damage response. To date, several domains including the plant homeodomain (PHD), lamin interacting domain (LID), and nuclear localization sequence (NLS) have been identified in the ING family of proteins that contribute to their function. To better understand the functional attributes of the ING proteins, we have developed and further characterized a panel of monoclonal IgGs that we call CAbs 1-9 based on their recognition sites, strength of binding affinity, and their specificity for ING1. All of the nine CAbs recognize the C-terminal half of the p33(ING1b) protein, which is fully conserved among all ING1 isoforms, being encoded by a common exon. Two of the nine CAbs bind a fragment that includes the PHD, which is the most conserved domain among ING family proteins (ING1-5), and one CAb cross-reacts with all ING family proteins that are encoded by different genes. Five of the nine CAbs recognized a fragment of ING1, which includes the NLS. Another two, CAb3 and CAb9, show affinity against an inter-domain sequence between the LID and the NLS. The sequence between the LID and NLS is less conserved among the ING proteins and, as expected, CAbs 3 and 9 were completely specific for ING1. Understanding the domains recognized by the different CAbs should further the functional analysis of the ING proteins that are known to participate in a wide variety of protein complexes, both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus where they bind epigenetic histone marks via their PHD regions and lamin A via their LID domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it