MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988931662 · doi:10.2523/iptc-13023-abstract

Applicability of SOS-FR (Steam-Over-Solvent Injection in Fractured Reservoirs) Method for Heavy-Oil Recovery from Deep Fractured Carbonates

2009· article· en· W1988931662 on OpenAlex
Tayfun Babadagli, Al Muatasim Mohammad Al Bahlani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam injectionImbibitionSolventSteam-assisted gravity drainageWater injection (oil production)Enhanced oil recoveryMatrix (chemical analysis)Phase (matter)GeologyOil sandsChemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract Tapping heavy-oil from fractured carbonates is a real challenge due to unfavourable rock and reservoir characteristics. Thermal or solvent injection techniques are two possible options to mobilize -matrix- oil of naturally fractured reservoirs by reducing its viscosity. Reservoir heating, however, becomes a necessity as the oil gravity gets lower and steam injection is the only effective way to heat the matrix containing oil using the fracture network as conduit to distribute steam. Reservoirs at marginal depths for effective steam injection (>800 m) adds more difficulty to the problem. The application eventually becomes hot-water injection but the efficiency of the process could be improved by adding a solvent component. We introduced a new technique called Steam-Over-Solvent in Fractured Reservoirs (SOS-FR) for efficient heavy-oil recovery from fractured reservoirs, more specifically carbonates. The process consists of cyclical injection of steam and solvent in the following manner: Phase-1: Steam injection to heat up the matrix and recover oil mainly by thermal expansion, Phase-2: Solvent injection to produce matrix oil through diffusion-imbibition-drainage processes, and Phase-3: Steam injection to retrieve injected solvent and recover more heavy-oil. Our preliminary experiments run under static conditions, i.e., soaking the sample into hot water and solvent alternately (SPE 117626) showed that, under very unfavorable conditions (oil-wet carbonates and sandstones, 14,000 cp crude), oil recovery at the end of Phase-3 was around 85–90% OOIP with 80–85% solvent retrieval, which was mainly due to wettability alteration. This paper presents further experimental results specifically on carbonates. Heptane was selected as the solvent to inject through a single-matrix/single-fracture oil-wet carbonates saturated with 14,000 cp oil. The previous static experiments were compared to the dynamic ones to reach a conclusion on optimal injection scheme; cyclic or continuous. For this analysis, the experimental results were matched to a single matrix/single fracture numerical model and parameters needed for field scale simulation (matrix-fracture interaction parameters such as thermal diffusion, solvent diffusion and dispersion coefficients) were obtained. Using the data obtained through matching, field scale simulations were performed. The main focus was the matrix size and first an up-scaling study to field conditions was performed. Then, a field-scale sensitivity analysis was carried out to identify the optimal injection scheme for different depths (soaking time for cyclic and injection rate for continuous injection) and durations, and surface steam quality. Specific observations and conclusions as to how to apply this technique in the field economically were reported. It is hoped this new technique will be an alternative for tapping heavy matrix oil from oil-wet, fractured, deep, carbonate fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it