MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988935192 · doi:10.1139/p01-146

Radiation effect on MHD free-convective flow of a gas past a semi-infinite vertical plate with variable thermophysical properties for high-temperature differences

2002· article· en· W1988935192 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emad M. Abo-Eldahab, M S El Gendy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLaminar flowMagnetohydrodynamicsMechanicsThermal conductivityBoundary layerBoundary value problemThermodynamicsConvectionFilm temperatureMagnetic fieldHeat transferThermal conductionThermal radiationHeat fluxNusselt numberTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation effects in the presence of a uniform transverse magnetic field on the free-convective steady laminar boundary-layer flow, past a semi-infinite vertical plate, for high-temperature differences are studied. The fluid density and the thermal conductivity are assumed to vary linearly with temperature. The fluid viscosity is assumed to vary as a reciprocal of a linear function of temperature. The nonlinear boundary-layer equations, governing the problem under consideration, are solved numerically by applying an efficient numerical technique based on the shooting method. The effects of the magnetic field M, the temperature ratio parameter θ w , the thermal conductivity parameter S, the viscosity–temperature parameter θ r , and the radiation parameter N are examined on the velocity and temperature distributions as well as the coefficient of heat flux and the shearing stress at the plate. PACS No.: 44.40+a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207