MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988954993 · doi:10.1016/j.phf.2009.01.005

Naturbezüge in der ökologischen Gesundheitsförderung

2009· article· de· W1988954993 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Forum · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnvironmental Science and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUmweltPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Einleitung Die Ottawa-Charta behandelt ausdrücklich den Stellenwert natürlicher Ressourcen für die menschliche Gesundheit: „Die enge Bindung zwischen Mensch und Umwelt bildet die Grundlage für einen sozial-ökologischen Weg zur Gesundheit […]. Jede Strategie zur Gesundheitsförderung muss den Schutz der natürlichen und der sozialen Umwelt sowie die Erhaltung der vorhandenen natürlichen Ressourcen mit zu ihrem Thema machen“ (WHO, 1986). Hier äußert sich eine ökologische Gesundheitsperspektive, wie sie zur Tradition von Medizin und Hygiene seit der Antike gehört.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it