MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Facilitation in bark beetles: endemic mountain pine beetle gets a helping hand

2010· article· en· W1988987107 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory D. Smith, Allan L. Carroll, B. Staffan Lindgren

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural and Forest Entomology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDendroctonusMountain pine beetlePinus contortaBiologyBark beetleBark (sound)EcologyHost (biology)Population

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endemic populations of the bark beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae attack weakened lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia ) trees that are often previously infested by other bark beetle species, such as Pseudips mexicanus . The effect of interactions on D. ponderosae was assessed by examining host selection and productivity of D. ponderosae in trees containing P. mexicanus and trees infested solely by D. ponderosae . The findings obtained show that D. ponderosae attacked hosts previously occupied by P. mexicanus at greater densities, and offspring emerged earlier compared with hosts infested by D. ponderosae alone. Additionally, D. ponderosae larvae in P. mexicanus ‐infested trees were found to require a significantly lower amount of resource to complete development with no loss in size. The presence of P. mexicanus may affect host condition, improving the subcortical environment for endemic D. ponderosae , ultimately aiding in population maintenance at low levels. Hosts in this state should be preferentially attacked by D. ponderosae .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural and Forest EntomologySame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207