MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989003536 · doi:10.5589/m09-013

Effect of microtopography on RADARSAT-1 and PALSAR backscattering from rock alteration products in the Curaçá Valley, Brazil

2009· article· en· W1989003536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Waldir Renato Paradellá, A. Q. Silva, Sheila Soraya Alves Knust, Tiago Nunes Rabelo, A.R. dos Santos, Camilo Daleles Rennó, Cleber Gonzales de Oliveira, T. G. Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Aerospace Exploration Agency
KeywordsGeologySynthetic aperture radarSchistLithologyOutcropProterozoicGranuliteAzimuthGeomorphologyRemote sensingSeismologyGeochemistryTectonicsFaciesGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis paper addresses the influence of microtopography (root mean square height HRMS and correlation length LC) on RADARSAT-1 and phased array L-band synthetic aperture radar (PALSAR) backscattering coefficient (σ0) values from distinct rock alteration products of the Cu-rich district of Curaçá Valley, northeastern Brazil. The area is characterized by a semiarid environment, flat topography with rock outcrops and residual soils, and low to moderate Caatinga vegetation cover. The lithologies consist of Archean gneisses and granulites interbedded with mafic-ultramafic intrusives and upper Proterozoic marbles, schists, and phyllites. The images were acquired under distinct look azimuth and incidence angles and corresponded to four RADARSAT-1 images (F2, S2, and S7 ascending and S7 descending) and one PALSAR image (fine beam dual (FBD) descending). The research was based on the use of linear regression analyses, which showed a weak to moderate linear correlation between σ0 and HRMS and LC for both SAR data. HRMS was the most important microtopographic parameter influencing σ0, whereas LC played a secondary role. Regarding RADARSAT-1, the highest regression coefficient (R2) values were obtained for shallower incidence angles (S7), and this dependence increased from steeper to shallower incidence, regardless of changes in the look azimuth. For PALSAR, R2 was slightly higher than that for RADARSAT-1 and was related to cross-polarization. The investigation showed that backscattering for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data from both RADARSAT-1 and PALSAR is not modulated in a predominant manner by the microtopographic variations of the geological surfaces.Dans cet article, nous examinons l’influence de la microtopographie (hauteur RMS = HRMS et longueur de corrélation = LC) sur les valeurs de σ0 de RADARSAT-1 et de PALSAR à partir de différents produits d’altération de roches dans le district riche en cuivre de la vallée de Curaçá, dans le nord-est du Brésil. La région est caractérisée par un environnement semi-aride, une topographie plane avec des affleurements rocheux et des sols résiduels, ainsi qu’un couvert de végétation de faible à modéré de Caatinga. Les lithologies consistent en des gneiss et des granulites archéens intercalés avec des couches de roches intrusives mafiques et ultramafiques et des marbres, des schistes et des phyllites du Protérozoïque supérieur. Les images ont été acquises en fonction de différents modes de visée, d’azimuts et d’angles d’incidence et consistaient en quatre images de RADARSAT-1 (faisceaux F2, S2 et S7 ascendants, S7 descendant) et une image de PALSAR (FBD c.-à-d. faisceau étroit descendant en polarisation double). Cette recherche était basée sur l’utilisation d’analyses de régression linéaire et a permis d’observer une corrélation linéaire variant de faible à modérée entre σ0 et HRMS et LC pour les deux types de données RSO. HRMS constituait le paramètre microtopographique le plus important affectant la valeur de σ0 tandis que LC y jouait un rôle secondaire. En ce qui concerne les données de RADARSAT-1, les valeurs les plus élevées de R2 ont été obtenues pour les angles d’incidence plus faibles (S7) et cette dépendance augmentait des angles d’incidence plus grands vers les angles plus faibles, indépendamment des changements dans la visée et l’azimut. Pour ce qui est des données de PALSAR, la valeur de R2 était légèrement supérieure à celle des données de RADARSAT-1 et celle-ci était associée au phénomène de polarisation croisée. Cette recherche a montré que la rétrodiffusion pour les deux types de données RSO n’est pas modulée de façon prédominante par les variations de la microtopographie des surfaces géologiques.[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207