MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989016634 · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.008

Structure–activity relationships of diphenylpiperazine N-type calcium channel inhibitors

2010· article· en· W1989016634 on OpenAlexafffund
Hassan Pajouhesh, Zhong‐Ping Feng, Yanbing Ding, Lingyun Zhang, Hossein Pajouhesh, Jerrie-Lynn Morrison, Francesco Belardetti, Elizabeth Tringham, Eric Simonson, Todd W. Vanderah, Frank Porreca, Gerald W. Zamponi, Lester A. Mitscher, Terrance P. Snutch

Bibliographic record

VenueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryN-type calcium channelCalcium channelCalcium channel blockerNeuropathic painCalciumPharmacologyStructure–activity relationshipSelectivityT-type calcium channelVoltage-dependent calcium channelStereochemistryIn vitroBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel series of compounds derived from the previously reported N-type calcium channel blocker NP118809 (1-(4-benzhydrylpiperazin-1-yl)-3,3-diphenylpropan-1-one) is described. Extensive SAR studies resulted in compounds with IC(50) values in the range of 10-150 nM and selectivity over the L-type channels up to nearly 1200-fold. Orally administered compounds 5 and 21 exhibited both anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic activity in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207