MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989016731 · doi:10.4000/critiquedart.15324

The Stage and the Museum, a Contemporary Dynamic

2014· article· en· W1989016731 on OpenAlexaff
Franz Anton Cramer

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique d’art · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsAMT Die Casting (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionSpectacleObject (grammar)Visual artsSign (mathematics)ArtChoreographyStage (stratigraphy)Art historyDanceComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exhibiting and (re)presenting -otherwise put, the exhibition and the spectacle- are the two sides of one and the same coin. Whereas, for the past ten years or so, choreography has started to move away from the stage of the present and invade those places of history called museums, theatres and art festivals are experimenting with the variable forms of exhibitions and retrospectives. It is under the sign of an increasing immaterialization of the art object that exhibition curators and artists...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.042
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritique d’artSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207