Measurement of Thermodiffusion Coefficient for Binary Hydrocarbon Fluid Mixtures in Porous Medium: Experimental and Numerical Results
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been a discussion that the thermodiffusion in porous medium is not identical to thermodiffusion in clear liquid. To validate this finding, a new thermodiffusion cell has been designed to measure thermal and molecular diffusion coefficients of binary mixture in porous medium under high pressure. A porous layer located between two liquid layers that cross two laser beams, is used. The difference of refractive index is obtained from the analysis of the interferograms recorded with a CCD camera. From the kinetics, the values of molecular and thermal diffusion coefficients through the porous medium were determined. The two binary systems dodecane (C12) and isobutylbenzene (IBB), and dodecane (C12) and tetrahydronaphthalene (THN) are used to validate the experimental setup at atmospheric pressure. Experimental results reveal an excellent agreement with benchmark values and a good agreement with theoretical data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it