MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989066343 · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2365140

Local Symmetry Detection in Natural Images Using a Particle Filtering Approach

2014· article· en· W1989066343 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Widynski, Antoine Moevus, Max Mignotte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSymmetry (geometry)Reflection symmetryComputer visionHomogeneous spaceSegmentationLocal symmetryTracking (education)Image segmentationComputer scienceParticle filterRibbonObject detectionAlgorithmMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)GeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an algorithm to detect smooth local symmetries and contours of ribbon-like objects in natural images. The detection is formulated as a spatial tracking task using a particle filtering approach, extracting one part of a structure at a time. Using an adaptive local geometric model, the method can detect straight reflection symmetries in perfectly symmetrical objects as well as smooth local symmetries in curved elongated objects. In addition, the proposed approach jointly estimates spine and contours, making it possible to generate back ribbon objects. Experiments for local symmetry detection have been conducted on a recent extension of the Berkeley segmentation data sets. We also show that it is possible to retrieve specific geometrical objects using intuitive prior structural information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207