MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989066343 · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2365140

Local Symmetry Detection in Natural Images Using a Particle Filtering Approach

2014· article· en· W1989066343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSymmetry (geometry)Reflection symmetryComputer visionHomogeneous spaceSegmentationLocal symmetryTracking (education)Image segmentationComputer scienceParticle filterRibbonObject detectionAlgorithmMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)GeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an algorithm to detect smooth local symmetries and contours of ribbon-like objects in natural images. The detection is formulated as a spatial tracking task using a particle filtering approach, extracting one part of a structure at a time. Using an adaptive local geometric model, the method can detect straight reflection symmetries in perfectly symmetrical objects as well as smooth local symmetries in curved elongated objects. In addition, the proposed approach jointly estimates spine and contours, making it possible to generate back ribbon objects. Experiments for local symmetry detection have been conducted on a recent extension of the Berkeley segmentation data sets. We also show that it is possible to retrieve specific geometrical objects using intuitive prior structural information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it